Facebook_IPO

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged Nasdaq with securities laws violations resulting from what the SEC calls ‘its poor systems and decision-making’ during the initial public offering (IPO) and secondary market trading of Facebook shares. Nasdaq has agreed to settle the SEC’s charges by paying a $10 million penalty – the largest ever against an exchange. You can read SEC’s order to Nasdaq here.

George S. Canellos (Co-Director, Division of Enforcement, SEC): This action against NASDAQ tells the tale of how poorly designed systems and hasty decision-making not only disrupted one of the largest IPOs in history, but produced serious and pervasive violations of fundamental rules governing our markets.

Nasdaq made a series of ill-fated decisions, says the SEC. Several members of Nasdaq’s senior leadership team convened a ‘Code Blue’ conference call. They decided not to delay the start of secondary market trading in Facebook, with the expectation that they had fixed the system limitation by removing a few lines of computer code, says the SEC in a statement.

Nasdaq’s decision to initiate trading before fully understanding the problem caused violations of several rules, including Nasdaq’s fundamental rule governing the price/time priority for executing trade orders, according to the SEC. The problem caused more than 30,000 Facebook orders to remain stuck in Nasdaq’s system for more than two hours when they should have been either immediately executed or cancelled.

What went wrong with the Facebook IPO?

The matching of buy and sell orders in an IPO is referred to as ‘the cross.’ According to the SEC’s order, the systems problems encountered during the Facebook IPO on May 18, 2012, caused the cross to fall 19 minutes behind the orders received by Nasdaq, whose IPO cross application calculated the price and volume of the cross based on the orders and cancellations received up until 11:11 a.m.

This time discrepancy caused more than 38,000 marketable Facebook orders placed between 11:11 a.m. and 11:30:09 a.m. to not be included in the cross. Approximately 8,000 of those orders were entered into the market at 11:30 a.m. when continuous trading commenced, and the remaining 30,000 were ‘stuck’ orders.

Immediately prior to the cross, Nasdaq officials noticed a discrepancy between the final indicative pricing and volume totals and the actual totals. This discrepancy indicated that there was still a problem with the cross and that some cross-eligible orders may not have been handled properly. Nasdaq failed to address this issue during the minutes and hours following the cross. Nasdaq’s Facebook issues also caused problems in the trading of Zynga shares, and Nasdaq failed to execute 365 orders for Zynga shares in accordance with the price/time priority requirements.

According to SEC, Nasdaq further violated its rules when it assumed a short position in Facebook of more than three million shares in an unauthorized error account. Nasdaq’s rules do not permit it to use an error account for any purpose. Nasdaq subsequently covered that short position for a profit of approximately $10.8 million, also in violation of its rules. Nasdaq further violated its rules in three other ways during the opening of trading after the end of the display-only period for Facebook and following a halt in Zynga trading.

The SEC’s order also charges Nasdaq’s affiliated third party broker-dealer Nasdaq Execution Services (NES) with failing to maintain sufficient net capital reserves on the day of the Facebook IPO as a result of Nasdaq’s own Facebook trading through the unauthorized error account.

In separate incidents unrelated to the Facebook IPO, the SEC’s order additionally charges Nasdaq with violations of Regulation NMS and Regulation SHO based on its failure to appropriately monitor and enforce compliance with price-test restrictions in October 2011 and August 2012.

List of Nasdaq Violations

The SEC’s order finds that Nasdaq violated Section 19(g)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by not complying with several of its own rules, and that NES violated Section 15(c)(3) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15c3-1 thereunder by failing to maintain sufficient net capital reserves on May 18, 2012. Additionally, Nasdaq violated Rule 201(b) of Regulation SHO during two separate incidents in October 2011 and August 2012 and also violated Rule 611 of Regulation NMS during the October 2011 incident. Nasdaq and NES agreed to a settlement without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings. The order censures Nasdaq and NES, imposes a $10 million penalty on Nasdaq, and requires both Nasdaq and NES to cease and desist from committing or causing these violations and any future violations. The order also requires Nasdaq and NES to complete numerous undertakings.

[Image courtesy: Facebook]